Academic institutions have revived towns and cities, spreading opportunity and reskilling the workforce, among other benefits.
We continue our series, putting this year’s local elections under the magnifying glass, to explore changes and trends.
My great fear is that isolationism on the left and right could take root. And not all interventions have been disastrous – let alone about imposing our values.
They claim mandatory jabs are an “infringement on personal freedom”. Never mind when they locked students down in halls last year.
Threatening young people to “take the vaccine or else!” sets the groundwork for reducing confidence in the Government’s rationale.
Our introduction to: what each Bill is, the politics of it, who’s responsible, arguments for and against – and a controversy rating out of ten.
Starmer could show he understands the priorities of working class voters by spending more on universities and backing an English Parliament.
Furthermore, they should be more proactive in defending the financial interests of their members.
Much like a parent intent on disciplining their naughty child, this Government’s preferred policy tool seems to be prohibition.
Never mind that such a person would never pay off what they owe: the eye-watering fact is that interest itself becomes 68 per cent of the total debt.
He’s proof that your boat can be swept along by the same tide as others, but how you steer it is a matter of individual style.
The Government should instead look into reviewing the Equality Act, which makes these institutions subject to its harassment provision.
Providing local, flexible, workspaces could replace millions of daily commutes which only serve to harm the environment.
Some of the criticisms that have been thrown at the scheme can only be described as inaccurate, misrepresentations.
Zahawi, the new Education Secretary, should consider whether the bill as it stands is a sticking plaster.