Admirable as Singapore is, the more one learns about it, the harder one finds identifiable the copy-and-paste solutions British politicians are so often looking for.
Growth is as much a political problem as it is an economic one. We need to spend vastly more time thinking about the trade-offs and compromises required to achieve it, how to sequence reforms, and which battles to pick and when.
My hunch is the next generation of aspiring leaders will have a firmer grip on the meaning of conservatism than the current crop. Or, at least, I hope so — otherwise there might not be a party to lead.
The eight part of our series on reducing demand for government, in which we set out a programme for change – focused on families, civil society and government.
If research were seen as an investment rather than a charitable donation, then the sector would enjoy higher levels of funding than it does now.
As I vote on legislation passing through Parliament, I notice a steady stream of laws that we could not have passed were we still in the EU.
This list of allies and partners includes Australia, Israel, South Korea, Japan, Oman, Qatar and Singapore.
I was surprised to see Daniel Hannan argue that the Government is failing to distance itself from the EU.
Be it getting Brexit done or record job numbers and mega manufacturing investment, Johnson has delivered here.
Our columnist provides the second piece in our series this week about Brexit – almost a year since the end of transition.
A unified approach against this authoritarian power is the only way to combat Chinese influence and expansion.
Our exit from the EU should allow fresh thinking and a new regulatory approach – to allow the UK to reach its full economic potential.
My view is that the only way to help square this circle is to rediscover our concern for public service reform.
Governments need not be morally or religiously prescriptive in promoting marriage. Instead, it should be acknowledged empirically that the institution tends to benefit people.