We need to break away from a culture that sees politics as some sort of X Factor contest.
The naive globalisation of the 1990s has become a liability. Britain and its allies need to beef up their defences
The UK needs a fresh, robust template. Central to it should be a differentiation between strategic and non-strategic areas.
Ministers have no sufficient answers to the question: ‘how do we keep the lights on?’
Backing traditional industries is very far from the electoral liability that strategists fear.
Every day criminals look for ways to infect British businesses with malware to prevent them from functioning until a ransom is paid.
The inquisitors of Tate Britain have deemed Hogarth problematic. Is no one safe from their dangerous ideology?
You should not have to risk your life in a small boat. You should be able to apply at a British embassy and arrive on a plane.
Our new council aims to help bolster our industrial and technological base, and boost our diplomatic and military power.
There are also diplomatic and geostrategic opportunities for Global Britain to lead on developing human and environmental standards.
Central to the whole debate is the question of people’s buy in to what the transition means for their own lifestyle.
Those who want to project force in the Pacific must explain how it would be consistent with maintaining our strength at home and nearer abroad.
The row over the Northern Ireland Protocol must not be allowed to poison co-operation with our continental partners on defence against Russia.
“The point here is that we have made progress and then we’re going to have to take stock of where there is a gap”, he says.
Voters want toughness on crime and illegal immigration, plus greater investment into public services and local communities.