Any deal concluded without treaty change could be immediately undermined by the supremacy of European courts.
In “Hard Bargains or Weak Compromises”, Dr Lee Rotherham and I probe whether association rather than membership would be best for Britain.
But he remains our best chance of getting an In/Out referendum.
The Prime Minister has talked tough on serious EU reform – now we need to see his actions live up to his words.
To avoid dangerous ambiguity, we need a clear idea of what change would be required to make staying ‘In’ acceptable. Here’s ours.
We have named four – IDS, Grayling, Gove and Hammond. The Times cites Letwin. Javid has said that he’s not afraid of Britain leaving.
European Unionists know that know that only an eventual deepening of our commitment, including, above all, joining the euro, will secure our membership.
And only two in five of these respondents plumped for an end to EU free movement or exit.
The strength of voter concern about immigration has now reached such a pitch that voters are turning away from the mainstream parties.
Cameron’s options for a second term of government with Clegg are narrowing.
Or the Get-Outer side will seem shifty and cynical.
But the Justice Secretary says it isn’t realistic for one Parliamentary to veto laws for the whole EU
Tories are cheerful, socialists gloomy, the Scots expect to vote No…and UKIP supporters expect England to be knocked out in the first round of the World Cup.
Open Europe points to a hole in the air.
The Europhile establishment is now clamouring for an early referendum with less space for vital debate. We’re ready for them.