There is no democratic entitlement to engage in politically-motivated harassment or property damage.
Blair’s target of 50 percent of school leavers at university was a mistake. So why does the police force want to go even further?
Though Sue Gray waits in the wings, carrying her scythe and lantern. Will we see her report next week?
It’s best thought of as a contagion that spreads across the divide between parties and factions.
In Surrey, we see middle-class activists cause great damage and disruption before getting let off the hook.
My friend David Gauke was right to be vigilant about his important principle, but wrong to say it is in peril in the UK.
They should conduct their investigation without fear or favour – but transparency is not too much to expect.
The focus must be on the best person to cut crime. That is the way to restore confidence. Other issues are a distraction.
With his handsome 2019 majority, the Prime Minister may struggle to blame Labour for a limp response.
Too often viewed as a victimless crime, stolen vehicles are often used for drug running and worse.
I aim to give the police the training, equipment, and leadership they need to strengthen their relationship with the law-abiding public.
We need to be honest about what it is for and what it is not. Protecting life and property must come first.
The Government intends to introduce a Code of Practice, but must take care it doesn’t do more harm than good.
To waste time now on internal factionalisation would be indefensible to so many party members who worked so hard to secure our majority.