Nadhim Zahawi tells us that the President’s words and deeds will cause serious damage to the anti-ISIS struggle.
Downing Street may have briefed in advance that there’s no real comparison. But she will clearly play on it for all it’s worth.
“Let us renew the relationship that can lead the world towards the promise of freedom and prosperity marked out by those ordinary citizens 240 years ago.”
Allowing Russia to become top dog in the Middle East has consequences for Europe – including Britain.
Progress on the Islamic Republic’s nuclear ambitions should not lead us to pardon the regime’s violations of human rights.
The US rightly considers it to be the world’s biggest state sponsor of terror – and it has too often played a malicious role in the geopolitical morass of the Arab world.
Trump’s antics are a threat to the stability and peace of Europe.
Local forces are always going to trump the good intentions of foreign governments. Iraq is an object lesson in the high price of naïveté.
What evidence is there that you can increase the Party’s electoral reach? Would you bring back liberal interventionism? Would you appoint George Osborne to your Cabinet?
This is better way of dealing with both migration and the terror threat than the patchwork measures taken so far by the EU.
And, just as importantly, can it be held against ISIS and whoever might come after them?
The institution’s present popularity is dependent on the Queen, and, surely, her likeableness is tied to her apoliticism.
His failure to act against Assad helped to persuade young Sunni Muslims that he is against them.