It is bad enough that the EU undermines our democracy and harms our economy – but we also pay a fortune for the experience.
Today, we launch a five-part series on the case for Brexit on ConservativeHome.
Plus, why the voters of London would be lucky to have Syed Kamall as a mayoral candidate.
What does yesterday’s vote mean for British eurosceptics, for the Eurozone itself and for Cameron’s renegotiation?
Logic tells me there ought to be a negotiable compromise with the EU. Emotion makes me want to punch the Commission’s smug face.
His intervention deftly combined standing foursquare with David Cameron with reminding his audience that, when the referendum takes place, they may differ.
The Prime Minister was demanding “proper full-on treaty change”. Now we are told that we may have to accept a mere promise of it.
…which rather puts his support for a Yes vote into context.
Even if they do cobble together a deal, it won’t be meaningful reform and it won’t be lasting. Which leaves Out as the only option.
If Eurosceptics concentrate their energies on renegotiation, the case for In will be halfway round the country before Out has got its boots on.
With the EU Referendum Bill returning to the Commons this week, a Grand Bargain between the Party leadership and Eurosceptic MPs is urgently needed.
The First Minister may be trying to open clear, tartan water between her and the Prime Minister, but her statements are always qualified.
Our political opponents want us to split permanently over the EU. Let’s prove them wrong.
Dominic Grieve, no Better Off Outer, is concerned. And there are some on the Opposition benches feeling the same way.
Unnecessary and excessive EU regulation hampers the efforts of British businesses to compete.