Plus: We must be the Party for social housing as well as home ownership. And: why don’t we trumpet our history of social reform?
Security, cohesion, integration, solidarity: all are intangible. But we pay – literally – to gain them. Why single out self-government?
Remainers and Brexiteers alike must recognise the politicians are stuck in an ever-decreasing circle of fervour, hyperbole and hysteria.
It’s a politically sensitive subject and the Government has a lot on its plate, but the Treasury is right to be concerned with ensuring value for money.
I, like many colleagues, react badly to the Party’s decision to try and strong-arm me into voting for this deal.
Over the last couple of years in groups I’ve run, people have become simultaneously more obsessed about the service and more concerned about waste.
In the final article of our mini-series, the Onward Director says that there must also be a new strategy to help boost Britain’s productivity rate.
In the second article of our mini-series, the Harlow MP calls for a relentless focus on the cost of living, a skills-based economy, social injustices and affordable housing.
That doesn’t mean the Party needs to move right; on the contrary, it means accommodating on issues such as the NHS.
That’s you told, Johnson and Truss. Plus: a Universal Credit Brexit Dividend for working families.
The first in a series of three extracts from a new book of essays from Conservative Friends of International Development and Save the Children.
Our new fortnightly columnist on a renaissance which “through teamwork and shared vision, is producing real results”.
It is certainly not the Brexit that people voted for. As Bill Clinton might have said about the main issue: It’s the Sovereignty, Stupid!