I am deeply disappointed by the path that the Prime Minister has chosen. It seems to be the very opposite of what the British people voted for.
In certain respects, the UK’s leaving of the EU could reap animal welfare benefits on a scale hitherto unimaginable.
Cox told the Cabinet that the EU’s admittance that the backstop can be temporary was a step forward. He is right, although the devil will be in the detail.
A response to Jean-Claude Piris and others who argue that the idea simply won’t fly.
The former Foreign Secretary says May’s team are inexperienced in EU negotiations and are “pushing out disinformation”.
Brady reports no confidence moves against May that might not be no confidence moves at all.
Law enforcement has been misused to target political opponents. We must be wary to ensure the UK does not become complicit.
The UK plus EFTA would have a greater GDP than Germany. As one, we would be the largest economy in Europe.
It’s important that Party members have a correct understanding.
It comes down to whether people feel that the outcome has delivered May’s goal that the UK should “regain control of our own money, our own laws and our own borders”.
It is not perfect, but I believe it delivers the essentials of leaving the EU while also recognising the real fears held by many Remainers.
We are re-proving that ‘we learn from history that we do not learn from history’.
The Prime Minister once promised that: “We are not leaving only to return to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. That’s not going to happen.”
For nothing in return, by way of a guaranteed free trade deal, the Prime Minister is willing to hand over at least £40 billion, potentially £60 billion.