While they seek a silver bullet to keep us in the EU, the rest of the world is moving on.
Her speech yesterday sought to turn a weakness into a strength- by projecting Britain as a globally-engaged, progressive, aid-friendly country.
Maastricht made it clear that the EU was leaving the UK, preferring to become a superstate. We could never agree to such a project.
As a former Eurosceptic turned Remainer, I have adjusted to the new reality. Others – pro- or anti-EU – should do the same.
We have gained little, if any, benefit in terms of trade in return for the costs of membership.
There is a danger that those of us with strong opinions are not always the best judges of balance.
We are in danger of asking for the wrong things, in the wrong way and on the wrong timescale.
Commentators underestimated our growth potential before the referendum – and some are still doing so.
A curious alignment of remainer Unionists and Scottish nationalists was convinced that Brexit would cause the end of the UK. Fortunately, they were wrong.
The couple should sally forth to convey the message that Britain is ready and eager to seize the opportunities presented by liberation from Brussels.
So all other things being equal, Britain will have left the EU by the end of March 2019.
We cannot have a vote when all that is known is what legal deal has been agreed.
Impartiality shouldn’t be mistaken for overlooking so much that is good about Britain.
Those Remainer MPs who hope to continue the fight face particular difficulties.
It must be a target for expanded sanctions.