“…a set of trivial demands, something that isn’t going to fundamentally change the relationship between Britain and the EU.”
Here’s a case for and a case against.
The weakness of the Government’s EU renegotiation demands is a boon to the Leave campaign.
It is now clear that the renegotiation process has proved that the Union is incapable of reform.
It is unwise to celebrate the designation of the Lords’ proposal to lower the voting age as protected by financial privilege.
The Autumn Statement and Spending Review were far too interventionist.
There won’t be an agreement by Christmas, as Downing Street hoped. Indeed, there may not be an agreement at all.
Just like last month, 71 per cent would vote to leave, whilst 24 per cent would vote to remain.
We can become a global nation – but only by voting to Leave the EU.
Also: Welsh Conservatives attack urban-focused Labour. And did the Scottish Nationalists know of concerns about MP weeks before withdrawing the whip?
In the wake of the Paris bombings, the second of our profiles on European countries and institutions – and their role in Cameron’s EU renegotiation.
The key Eurosceptic donors who will fund the anti-EU campaign do not feel they can work with him. Will he step aside to aid the cause?
Perhaps it will not be beyond Elliott’s diplomatic skills to negotiate an amicable merger – with himself in charge.
The Conservatives for Britain Co-Chairman asks 24 questions about possible breaches of the Party Board’s decision to remain neutral.
The Corporation’s dedication to protecting the Europhile case from scrutiny, and to denying the people a say, is backfiring.