His green light for the German-Russian link to go ahead was an unpardonable security and environmental folly.
Opponents are fighting on different fronts – some arguing about whether to do anything while others arguing about who pays for what we do.
Setting a target for three decades in the future is illusory, lending itself to virtue-signalling and ill-thought-out measures.
We’re also doing outstanding research into green hydrogen, whose production can become increasingly affordable.
Here’s how we combine climate action and nature regeneration with fairness and levelling up.
A recent report launching a new coalition explains why we need new technologies that will deliver these at scale.
The first piece in a mini-series on ConHome this week on Net Zero and climate change.
It may gradually slide down the road to a more neutralist position in the years ahead – to paraphrase William Hague “In NATO, but not run by NATO.”
It won’t be sufficient to cover the costs just for the lowest income voters – most voters will need environmentally sustainable options to be heavily subsided.
It is about to embark on an ambitious plan for net zero carbon emissions when we can least afford it. There may be a more affordable option.
As the Government ushers us towards net zero, it had better be sure of the science. Unless it’s willing to risk a British equivalent of the Gilets Jaunes.
Moving the legacy costs of renewable energy subsidies off electricity bills will make heat pumps up to £200 a year cheaper to run,
The Green Home Grant Scheme wasn’t ambitious enough – and their willingness to give up on it speaks volumes.
The calling-in of a planning application to open a coalmine at Whitehaven suggests prioritising green optics over Northern livelihoods.
A proper commitment to British technological advancement would create jobs and boost skills – but above all, saves our communities.