It is absolutely vital that these issues are discussed this week and as part of post-Brexit trade talks.
The principle of “no taxation without representation” should apply. Why should a Swede be able to vote but not a Norwegian?
And, of course, only if there is an agreement to implement. Otherwise, we must leave immediately on 29th March 2019.
This would surely encourage more participation amongst all age groups, by raising awareness of the benefits. The Commonwealth Games this year should spur us on.
I understand the Government’s keenness to achieve a free trade agreement with the EU, but we need to be careful that the price is not too high.
She cannot be a stationary establishment figure when faced with the restless mood of the voting public. She must move forwards – or we risk a 1997-style wipeout.
Pro-EU Lords will not be able to block Brexit measures that are set out in May’s programme for Government.
Every day in the UK we get together to wonder why Britain abandoned the idea of fairness.
Commonwealth members include some largest and richest countries plus some of the smallest and least developed – all can share in greater prosperity.
Our real interests derive from forging understandings and ties with countries which have traditionally considered themselves British in all but name.
If it is too exotic a model, try Australia or New Zealand. They, too, have opened their markets, removing tariffs and trade barriers, liberalising their economies.
Starting with creating a designated channel for them, and continuing by heavily promoting the Registered Travellers Service.
Across this half-century, from Scarman after Brixton to MacPherson after Stephen Lawrence, governments have engaged only sporadically engaged with race.