The difference between us and the Labour is that we deal with the world and reality as it is – not as some utopia we would like it to be.
There is time to correct the lack of preparedness of our customs and computers for 2019. But it is running out.
We have, in effect, a national bar that takes the power to out of the hands of local people and leaves it with Sir Humphrey.
When other EU countries attempted to block the apps’ arrival, my British interlocutors said: “it could never happen here”.
His intention seems to be to develop a body of ideas. If so, it will need to be a programme that can move hearts as well as minds.
ConservativeHome’s proposals for Party reform, to avoid a repeat of the miserable snap election result.
It is wrong for those at the top to take advantage of the generosity of government, students, and other, far less well-remunerated, academic staff.
Instead of chasing targets for their own sake, we will be free to explore new opportunities for energy supply, jobs and environmental improvements.
We must not be forced by any settlement into following the EU’s tax, regulatory, social and migration model if we don’t want to.
The former Attorney-General also touches on Johnson and the £350 million – “a subject best parked” – and a definitive treatise on nymphomania.
The referendum was at least as much a vote against London as against Brussels – and those whose expert arrogance made them seem to many to be foreigners here.
We will have one shot at getting the revision of the Planning Framework right. This makes the next eighteen months critical for the Conservatives’ long-term future.
Here’s the irony: if we bite our tongues and say nothing, and if Brexit is lost, we lose the next election anyway.