The PM crashed about in a manner which recalled the short, brilliant, astonishingly abusive career of Lord Randolph Churchill.
A new collection of essays from Policy Exchange shows up some of the glaring defects of the planning system.
The PM’s critics treat him as a disgraceful person, who consorts with other disgraceful people. He indicates that they’re a lot of prosy, anti-American prigs.
“I’m very, very positive about China, but I’m very, very negative about the Chinese Communist Party.”
They make an odd couple, bound to infuriate each other, but already they have rescued PMQs from the torpor into which it had fallen.
American liberals have a fervent belief in equality, and will do everything they can for the American people short of spending any time with them.
Disraeli’s impudence and audacity, demonstrated in this collection of his sayings, cast light on the present Prime Minister’s conduct.
He would not conciliate the Liaison Committee by promising to meet it three times a year, let alone by holding an inquiry into Cummings.
“The new Sue Gray” – responsible for policing propriety and ethics – may yet be asked to rule whether Johnson’s adviser has behaved improperly.
The Prime Minister is being urged to employ more women, but here is one who already makes it difficult for him to get away with sloppy thinking.
The Leader of the Opposition was infuriated by these charges, but had forgotten the imperative need to be brief.
Rees-Mogg is right: we cannot tell children to go back to school if parliamentarians continue to play truant.
But David Enrich’s new book does include a lot about how Deutsche Bank lent the President the money needed to look successful.
The Leader of the Opposition showed, in the reasonable tone of a man on the Camden omnibus, that the official account is incoherent.
When Starmer tried to cross-examine him in order to produce clarity, Johnson simply refused to engage.